Our Responses to Lewandowsky’s Reply

A joint post by Ruth Dixon and Jonathan Jones

We do not find Lewandowsky, Gignac and Oberauer’s Reply to our Commentary persuasive. Their Reply is paywalled, but a Summary is here.

Our responses are on the following pages:
Part I: Reversing relationships
Part II: Satisficing
Part III: Skew
Part IV: Heteroscedasticity and Skew

My Garden Pond

I’m Ruth Dixon and this is my blog about my garden and other interests… this blog may go in any one of several directions. We’ll see what (if anything) people find interesting.

I work (part-time) at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford on how the civil service and central government has changed over the past 30 years or so. See http://xgov.politics.ox.ac.uk.  Some things from my work there may come into my blog.

Continue reading